article by Warren J. Matthews

What do you think of this? * Overall cancer risk reduced by 37% overall reduction in cancer mortality rates * 50% * 30% in colorectal cancer. Sounds sort of claims someone standing on the bench trying to sell snake oil to make … but surprise … These statements are from the mainstream … and from the simple natural multi-vitamins are not drugs! But that’s not all! Now it is said that if everyone over 65 took a daily multi that will save American taxpayers 0.6 billion over 5 years in Medicare spending, the reduced incidence of ischemic heart disease and other diseases caused by a weak immune system. These figures do not factor in the economic savings due to reduced colorectal cancer, diabetes, prostate cancer and a host of other diseases that can probably be avoided, because the right supplements. If the price of such savings would be much higher. OK … say these things? Earlier this month, had a conference in Washington DC entitled “Multivitamins and Public Health. Exploring the Evidence,” a conference presented the results of the study were simply fulfills the Lewin Group (healthcare consulting). It was funded by Wyeth Consumer Healthcare, which is part of the Wyeth Pharmaceutical Group. What the researchers did: They examined more than 125 clinical studies and scientific literature on whether all the health benefits of multivitamins and if so, whether these benefits translated into savings in health care bills, people aged 65 or older. Director of the Lewin Group, Allen Dobson, PhD, to put terms of learning outcomes, he said, “to find some cost-saving preventive measures, and is unusual to find cost savings of this magnitude (0.6 B) is very rare.” It is refreshing to turn around, someone associated with the “mainstream” medicine really admit that the preventive measures that actually works. As you may have noticed over the last few years have been a lot of misleading statements from those “mainstream” in the medical field will do their best to discourage people from using natural preventative measures. More positive ‘mainstream’ comments … Positive “mainstream” does not end with a comment in this survey! In the same week, a conference held at Washington, the results of another study published in The American Journal of Epidermiology the “mainstream” publication. This study at Harvard over the last twenty years. The results will undoubtedly annoy many opponents of natural preventive medicines but the facts speak for themselves. Here is a highlight: * the study, involving some 145,000 middle-aged and older adults. * In 1982, these adults were interviewed in connection with the use of multi-vitamin. * Their use was again 10 years later, the 1992nd * They were then followed again in the next five years. * During this period, 797 participants developed colorectal cancer. What the researchers found that after adjusting for health-conscious’ behaviors those participants that were regularly used multivitamins beginning of the study (at least 10 years of age) was 30% lower risk of colon / rectal cancer. It was also found that people who had recently started a food additive was not protective short term and the benefits it arises in the long run. It is important to remember. Early on, rather than later. enhance immunity against cancer is continuing a process of long-term. This study ties in with another well-known study of selenium (in the right form) was found to reduce the incidence of all cancers 37 % and the mortality rate of cancer by 50%. These two studies considered only the vitamins and minerals. They do not include many reputable studies have clearly established the antioxidants themselves also play an important role in cancer prevention. Unfortunately, most people have never heard most of these studies. If didand they acted on a lot of pain and suffering could be avoided. Now here’s something to think about: If the cardiovascular and other diseases caused by poor immune system can be significantly reduced simply to a multi-vitamin, and moreover, that the risk of colon / rectal cancer can be reduced to 30% of the multi-vitamins, and In addition, the risk of other cancers reduced by 37% just onemineral and selenium. What would happen to the overall risk profile if you’re after? * You took all the essential nutrients proven in clinical trials for effective cardiovascular health * Digestive health * Hormonal health * Key organ health, including the brain * And the choice of enzymes and immune strengthening herbal extracts * Used the latest scientific knowledge synergy and metabolic pathways in order to increase the impact of the individual ingredients, and you put them in capsules or tablets? I know the answer, because we have done just that when we produced Total Balance, which was first out of the protection of my family, and other benefits to our customers around the world. … But I can not tell you what I think is the answer because I would get in trouble to the authorities that there is no evidence yet in clinical trials. Instead, it may only relate to clinical trials the course of a few nutrients that we use. But … I will not leave to your imagination. To help your imagination whilst pondering this, I can say that a multi-vitamin products are very weak (but they are cheap). Other vitamin products, such as relatively regular alpha lipoic acid are several times more potent that common vitamins. The same is true of some other amino acids, herbal extracts and enzymes. I’ve linked to your survey results, only a few vitamins and minerals. I think you get the picture and see what I get if you studied the ingredient list of Total Balance. The impact of the total balance formula for overall health is not just a few times larger than the typical multi, but hundreds of times stronger. This is not an idle comment, but one based on science. It is important to offer last year, the negative effects of of drugs. It is never too early to start a prevention program